Bible Myths and their Parallels in other Religions Being a Comparison of the Old and New Testament Myths and Miracles with those of the Heathen Nations of Antiquity Considering also their Origin and Meaning
Page: 88Saul of Tarsus, said to be of a worthy and upright character, declared most solemnly, that Jesus himself appeared to him while on his way to Damascus, and again while praying in the temple at Jerusalem. (Acts xxii.)
[126:5] See Higgins: Anacalypsis, vol. ii. p. 345. Gibbon's Rome, vol. i. pp. 84, 85.
[126:6] Higgins: Anacalypsis, vol. i. p. 611.
[126:7] Æneid, lib. iv.
[126:8] Tacitus: Annals, bk. i. ch. x.
[126:9] Ibid. bk. ii, ch. lxxxii. and bk. xiii. ch. ii.
[127:1] See Middleton's Letters from Rome, pp. 37, 38.
[127:2] See Religion of the Ancient Greeks, p. 81, and Gibbon's Rome, vol. i. pp. 84, 85.
[127:3] Draper: Religion and Science, p. 8.
[127:4] Socrates: Eccl. Hist. Lib. 3, ch. xix.
[127:5] Draper: Religion and Science, p. 17.
[127:6] See Inman: Ancient Faiths, vol. i. p. 418. Bunsen: Bible Chronology, p. 5, and The Angel-Messiah, pp. 80 and 298.
[127:7] See Higgins: Anacalypsis, vol. ii. p. 113, and Draper: Religion and Science, p. 8.
[127:8] Hardy: Manual Budd., p. 141. Higgins: Anac., i. 618.
[128:1] Draper: Religion and Science, p. 8. Compare Luke i. 26-35.
[128:2] Philostratus, p. 5.
[128:4] See Higgins: Anacalypsis, vol. i. p. 151.
[129:1] Eusebius: Eccl. Hist., lib. 2, ch. xiii.
[129:2] Ibid. ch. xiii.
[129:3] See Mallet's Northern Antiquities.
[129:4] See Higgins: Anacalypsis, vol. ii. p. 32, Kingsborough: Mexican Antiquities, vol. vi. 166 and 175-6.
[129:6] See Kingsborough: Mexican Antiquities, vol. vi. p. 176.
[129:7] Ibid. p. 175.
[130:1] See Kingsborough: Mexican Antiquities, vol. vi. p. 176.
[130:2] Ibid. p. 166.
[130:4] Squire: Serpent Symbol, p. 187.
[130:5] Ibid. p. 188.
[130:8] Ibid. p. 190.
[131:1] Squire: Serpent Symbol, p. 191.
[131:4] Ibid. p. 192.
[131:5] "If we seek, in the first three Gospels, to know what his biographers thought of Jesus, we find his true humanity plainly stated, and if we possessed only the Gospel of Mark and the discourses of the Apostles in the Acts, the whole Christology of the New Testament would be reduced to this: that Jesus of Nazareth was 'a prophet mighty in deeds and in words, made by God Christ and Lord.'" (Albert Réville.)
[132:1] Mark, xiii. 32.
[132:2] Mark, x. 40.
[132:3] Mark, x. 18.
[132:4] Mark, xiv. 36.
[132:5] Mark, xv. 34.
[133:1] Matt. and Luke.
"The passages which appear most confirmatory of Christ's Deity, or Divine nature, are, in the first place, the narratives of the Incarnation and of the Miraculous Conception, as given by Matthew and Luke. Now, the two narratives do not harmonize with each other; they neutralize and negative the genealogies on which depend so large a portion of the proof of Jesus being the Messiah—the marvellous statement they contain is not referred to in any subsequent portion of the two Gospels, and is tacitly but positively negatived by several passages—it is never mentioned in the Acts or in the Epistles, and was evidently unknown to all the Apostles—and, finally, the tone of the narrative, especially in Luke, is poetical and legendary, and bears a marked similarity to the stories contained in the Apocryphal Gospels." (W. R. Greg: The Creed of Christendom, p. 229.)
[133:2] Luke, ii. 27.
[133:3] Luke, ii. 41-48.
[133:4] Matt. xiii. 55.
[133:5] Luke, iv. 22. John, i. 46; vi. 42. Luke, iii. 23.
[133:6] Luke, ii. 50.
[133:7] Matt. xiii. 57. Mark, vi. 4.
[133:8] Matt. xii. 48-50. Mark, iii. 33-35.
[133:9] Mark, iii. 21.
[133:10] Dr. Hooykaas.
[133:11] Acts, i. 14.
[133:12] Acts, xxi. 18. Gal. ii. 19-21.
[134:1] See The Bible for Learners, vol. iii. p. 57.
[134:2] Eusebius: Eccl. Hist., lib. 3, ch. xxiv.
[134:3] Mr. George Reber has thoroughly investigated this subject in his "Christ of Paul," to the reader is referred.
[134:4] See Gibbon's Rome, vol. i. pp. 515-517.
[135:1] Gibbon's Rome, vol. iv. pp. 488, 489.
[135:2] See Lardner's Works, vol. viii. pp. 395, 396.
[135:3] Ibid. p. 306.
[135:4] Ibid. p. 571.
[136:1] Eusebius: Eccl. Hist., lib. 5, ch. xxv.
[136:2] Lardner: vol. viii. p. 404.
[136:3] Irenæus: Against Heresies, bk. i. c. xxiv.
[137:1] See Gibbon's Rome, vol. iv. pp. 492-495.
[137:2] Not a worldly Messiah, as the Jews looked for, but an Angel-Messiah, such an one as always came at the end of a cycle. We shall treat of this subject anon, when we answer the question why Jesus was believed to be an Avatar, by the Gentiles, and not by the Jews; why, in fact, the doctrine of Christ incarnate in Jesus succeeded and prospered.
[137:3] "This strong expression might be justified by the language of St. Paul (God was manifest in the flesh, justified in the spirit, seen of angels, &c. I. Timothy, iii. 16), but we are deceived by our modern Bibles. The word which was altered to God at Constantinople in the beginning of the sixth century: the true meaning, which is visible in the Latin and Syriac versions, still exists in the reasoning of the Greek, as well as of the Latin fathers; and this fraud, with that of the three witnesses of St. John (I. John, v. 7), is admirably detected by Sir Isaac Newton." (Gibbon's Rome, iv. 496, note.) Dean Milman says: "The weight of authority is so much against the common reading of both these points (i. e., I. Tim. iii. 16, and I. John, v. 7), that they are no longer urged by prudent controversialists." (Note in Ibid.)
[138:1] Gibbon's Rome, vol. iv. pp. 492-497.
[138:2] See Chambers's Encyclopædia, art. "Apollinaris."
[138:3] Gibbon's Rome, vol. iv. p. 498.
[138:4] That is, separate him from God the Father, by saying that he, Jesus of Nazareth, was not really and truly God Almighty himself in human form.
[139:1] See Gibbon's Rome, vol. iv. p. 516.
THE STAR OF BETHLEHEM.
Being born in a miraculous manner, as other great personages had been, it was necessary that the miracles attending the births of these virgin-born gods should be added to the history of Christ Jesus, otherwise the legend would not be complete.